Nobility can be thought of in two ways: as part of a country’s structure or as a quality of individual people. In a monarchy, where there is no nobility at all, the system becomes a raw, unchecked dictatorship—like the old rule of the Turks. Nobility serves as a buffer to absolute power, spreading attention among several figures of importance instead of focusing solely on the ruler. In democracies, however, nobility isn’t necessary. These systems tend to be calmer and less prone to rebellion because people concentrate on the work itself rather than the status of individuals. When people do notice individuals, it’s usually because of what they contribute, not their family name or titles.
Take the Swiss, for example—they’ve managed to thrive despite differences in religion and regional governance. Their strength comes from a shared sense of practicality rather than respect for lineage or rank. Similarly, the United Provinces of the Low Countries (modern-day Netherlands) excel in governance. Equality among leaders ensures decisions are fair, and people are more willing to pay taxes and contribute because the system feels just.
Now, a large and influential nobility can give grandeur to a monarchy. It energizes the people, offering inspiration and leadership. But it can also drain resources, as nobles often live extravagantly. A balanced system works best—where nobles are powerful enough to maintain order among the lower classes but not so powerful that they threaten the authority of the king. Too many nobles, however, can strain the economy, as their wealth often dwindles over generations, leaving them with grand titles but limited means. This creates an awkward gap between their prestige and their actual resources.
When we think about individual nobility, it’s like admiring a castle that has survived centuries without falling into ruin or seeing a tree that has grown tall and strong over the years. Ancient noble families are the same—they stand as living monuments to endurance and history. By contrast, newly elevated nobility is often the result of raw power and ambition. These “new nobles” may be more capable and driven than their descendants because rising to prominence often requires a mix of good intentions and ruthless tactics. Still, it’s fair to let the memory of their virtues inspire future generations while letting their faults fade with them.
Being born into nobility often dampens ambition. Why work hard when you’ve already inherited privilege? But this lack of drive often leads to envy of those who rise through sheer effort. At the same time, noble birth protects individuals from the jealousy of others—they already possess honor, so there’s little left to resent. Kings benefit greatly from having competent nobles in their service. These figures naturally command respect, making it easier for the monarchy to manage people and get things done. Nobles, by virtue of their status, seem born to lead, and people tend to follow them instinctively.
